Combatting Midlife FOMO – Econlib


We warn you to arrange for this deep dive dialog about life, midlife, and our inevitable loss of life.

EconTalk host Russ Roberts holds the view that “the poignance of loss of life provides a richness to day-to-day life,” a thought he’s shared in earlier episodes. In this episode, Russ welcomes thinker Kieran Setiya, who shares private tales from his e-book, Midlife: A Philosophical Guide, and proposes that FOMO and aggressive tendencies contribute to the malaise that impacts so many within the backside of the U formed happiness curve also called the mid-life disaster. Setiya argues we will be taught to take care of the ennui to which so many midlifers succumb–together with regrets for roads not taken and wistfulness for what might have been. Setiya argues {that a} well-lived life wants fewer tasks and extra pursuits that don’t have targets or endpoints.

We hope that these questions invite introspection and maybe an existential dialog. Please share a response for others to contemplate; we worth all your insights.



1- Whether or not you might be approaching, are in, or are past midlife, how does the “mild U” of life satisfaction resonate with you? To what extent has the midlife trope formed your outlook on life?


2- Each John Stuart Mill and Kieran Setiya suffered an youth disaster on the ages of 20 and 35 respectively.  Each skilled the paradox of dissatisfaction with life whereas concurrently being “profitable.” What are some similarities and variations of their tales? What different circumstances can help this paradox?


3- Aristotle known as it “contemplation of the construction of the cosmos”. Kieran Setiya refers back to the similar factor as existential worth, utilizing John Stuart Mill’s love of poetry for instance. Do you agree with Setiya that just about everybody has some type of artwork that’s deeply significant to them? Do you?


4- Roberts means that “you’re both dwelling solely prior to now or sooner or later” when your life is targeted on tasks and targets. He believes that our cultural affect to worth optimizing leads us astray. How does Kieran Setiya relate optimization (of articles revealed) to considering loss of life?


5- Setiya means that “existential FOMO is inevitable and that it’s a operate of one thing good”. Do you consider this “worth pluralism” as optimistic or unfavourable? Does your view resonate with Russ Roberts proposal that ”You haven’t any thought what life’s going to be like”? Clarify.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *