Possibly. Possibly not. Some causes to marvel.
As Calculated Risk notes, LA port visitors is down. A decline in port visitors often indicators a downturn in imports. Determine 1 exhibits the evolution of those two collection earlier than and throughout the pandemic.
Determine 1: Items imports in billions Ch.2012$/mo, n.s.a. (blue, left log scale), and containers (TEUs) at LA and Lengthy Seaside ports, n.s.a. (tan, log proper scale). Actual imports calculated deflating by import value deflator obtained from seasonally adjusted collection. NBER outlined peak-to-trough recession dates shaded grey. Supply: Census, Port of LA, Port of Lengthy Seaside, NBER, and writer’s calculations.
A regression of 1 collection on the opposite yields an adj-R2 of 0.32, with a slope coefficient (log-log) of 0.32. Every 1% enhance in container visitors at LA and Lengthy Seaside ports is related to a 0.3% enhance in actual items imports.
Imports are certainly declining so far as we are able to inform, for knowledge going by way of December, and if port visitors is any indicator, January (n.s.a.) imports will stay depressed relative to previous peak.
Determine 2: Items imports ex-oil (blue, left log scale), and month-to-month GDP (purple, proper log scale), each in billions Ch.2012$ SAAR. Supply: BEA/Census and IHS Markit/SP International.
In reality, imports have fallen extra drastically than GDP within the final 3 recessions (and actually, GDP didn’t fall within the 2001 recession). Within the 2007-09 recession, I famous that the collapse in imports advised a deep recession was seemingly (see prime proper graph in Determine 3 under).
Determine 3: GDP (tan), and imports of products ex-oil (blue), each in logs, normalized to 0 at NBER peak (purple dashed line). Normalization for 2022 assumes peak at 2022Q4. Supply: BEA, NBER, and writer’s calculations.
Curiously, the present scenario differs from previous; non-oil imports have been falling as GDP has risen, prior to now two quarters (taking 2022Q4 as peak).
One cause to not suppose imports predict a recession this time round is the anomalous habits of products consumption throughout the pandemic. Determine 3 exhibits the products consumption and imports consumption relative to ranges at 2020M02 (NBER outlined peak).
Determine 4: Items imports ex-oil (blue), and consumption of products (purple), each distinction from 2020M02, in billions Ch.2012$ SAAR. NBER outlined peak-to-trough recession dates shaded grey. Supply: BEA, NBER, and writer’s calculations.
Imports of products have been excessive as a result of consumption of products was excessive. The deceleration of the latter is then in step with the depressed (comparatively) stage of products imports.
So it is perhaps the case that decrease items imports are signalling a slowdown. Certainly, that’s no less than a part of the story (as will be seen in decrease mixture — items and providers — consumption, which peaked in 2022M10). However the different a part of the story is the normalization of consumption patterns, and a reallocation of spending towards providers and away from items.
That being mentioned, consensus remains to be for recession, in Q1 (IHS Markit/SP International) or 2023H2 (for others), whereas GS has taken the chance to 35%.